Trying to get my fuel tanks organized as the rest of the spar installation steps are wrapping up. My 13 gal 7ECA fuel tanks have three bungs each for forward and rear vents and engine fuel feed. The tanks were plumbed with a combination of AN and brass fittings. The bungs in the tank are pipe threads, the AN fittings are 37 degree flare fittings. I say all of this because the next person along might get a jump on things by reading it, I'm kind of figuring it out as I go and my IA is vacationing at the moment so I'm trying not to disturb him. 
So far it looks like each bung will need to be transitioned from pipe threads to a flare fitting using an AN816 nipple
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/an816-nipple-fitting
And it looks like for each tubing connection I'll need an MS20819 Sleeve and AN818 Nut
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/ms20819-sleeve-fitting
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/an818-nut
Adapters, extensions, etc. all seem to stick with the pipe thread fittings until there's a tubing to connect at which point they transition to the flare fitting
Here's my dilemma though, is it ok to come out of the tank with a single compression to flare adapter and then connect a tube with a 90 degree bend just a few inches from the fitting or are bends close to the tank better done with a combination of fittings that end with a pipe-to-flare 90 degree elbow like this?
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/ms20822-elbow-fitting
I'd prefer to minimize the number of fittings and take advantage of my handy tubing bender for a much cleaner and simpler installation but what is considered standard in aviation?
I'm not sure which of these two options would have been factory original back in 1968.
Edit: Looking in my parts manual, it looks like a single pipe-to-pipe nipple is installed in the tank bung with a pipe-to-flare elbow and the tubing attached directly to that. In the photo I attached to the post below you can see there is a male nipple in each bung, with a female adapter and then a pipe-to-flare elbow, probably to extend the fittings out of the wing root. Anyone else have the same or something different?
Thanks!
Bart
So far it looks like each bung will need to be transitioned from pipe threads to a flare fitting using an AN816 nipple
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/an816-nipple-fitting
And it looks like for each tubing connection I'll need an MS20819 Sleeve and AN818 Nut
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/ms20819-sleeve-fitting
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/an818-nut
Adapters, extensions, etc. all seem to stick with the pipe thread fittings until there's a tubing to connect at which point they transition to the flare fitting
Here's my dilemma though, is it ok to come out of the tank with a single compression to flare adapter and then connect a tube with a 90 degree bend just a few inches from the fitting or are bends close to the tank better done with a combination of fittings that end with a pipe-to-flare 90 degree elbow like this?
https://aircraftproducts.wicksaircraft.com/viewitems/an-ms-fittings/ms20822-elbow-fitting
I'd prefer to minimize the number of fittings and take advantage of my handy tubing bender for a much cleaner and simpler installation but what is considered standard in aviation?
I'm not sure which of these two options would have been factory original back in 1968.
Edit: Looking in my parts manual, it looks like a single pipe-to-pipe nipple is installed in the tank bung with a pipe-to-flare elbow and the tubing attached directly to that. In the photo I attached to the post below you can see there is a male nipple in each bung, with a female adapter and then a pipe-to-flare elbow, probably to extend the fittings out of the wing root. Anyone else have the same or something different?
Thanks!
Bart
Last edited:
