I have a slight left wing low bias at cruise speed. Is adjustment to the wing strut the way that is dealt with?
There are a couple possibilities that spring to mind:
1) Unequal fuel burn from left and right tanks. In my 7KCAB on a calm day, trimmed for straight and level flight, I can bank slightly left or right by leaning to one side of the cockpit or the other. It's pretty sensitive in that axis, and when you consider how much farther out the fuel is setting in the tanks, a couple gallons difference side to side will give a slight wing low attitude.
2) I also had a slight left wing low bias when I flew my Citabria home after purchasing it, but I also noted the ball was about a half ball right of center in my normal cruise (about 2200 rpm). When I corrected the rudder, it naturally corrected the left wing low attitude. It it were 1/4 or 1/8 of a ball off center a pilot might not notice or care.
In any event, a slight tweak on the trim tab to add a bit more right rudder in cruise fixed the problem at 2200 rpm cruise. However when I cruise at 2450 rpm it needs a touch of left rudder, so it's not that it was "wrong" before, it's that it was set up for a faster cruise speed.
1&2 are just how it is with an aircraft that doesn't have rudder or aileron trim.
-----
Pilots (and their well meaning but sometimes misguided A&Ps, especially non-pilot A&Ps) can be tempted to mess with the rear strut fork and start playing with the incidence angle on the wing to correct a one wing low cruise condition. That's often a really bad idea as unless the angle of incidence is actually wrong before they start, it creates other much more serious issues.
For example the first 180 hp 7GCBC I ever flew (1985 or so) flew great at cruise, but it would drop a wing in a stall every time. In fact the first time I tried a short field take off in it, (which was my first take off in it) it slammed the left wheel back on the ground as soon as I rotated and needed aggressive control inputs to keep it from skipping off the left side of the runway. In the air it was no better, dropping the left wing in a stall and clearly wanting to depart into a spin if you were not very careful with the rudder. It was just as bad in a full stall, tail wheel first landing, with the same drop the left wing first trait.
One of the high time ag pilots gave me crap about my take off and landing performance after the flight. I didn't bother explaining as it would have been seen as an excuse. I also didn't bother explaining that it was improperly rigged, I just handed him the clipboard and said "show me how short you can get it off the ground". He took me up on that and several off us watched him depart the left side of the (150' wide!) runway skipping on the left main wheel. When he got back we both agreed some moron had increased the incidence angle on the left wing to deal with the additional torque and power of its very healthy 0-360 engine and climb prop (it was set up for banner and glider towing), rather than putting a trim tab on the rudder to allow the rudder to properly address it. Ideally, it would have had a bit of offset in the vertical fin, but that's a much more involved and expensive fix.
Based on that experience, I prefer to confirm proper wing rigging by taking it up and then doing a power off stall to ensure both wings stall at the same time, (with the stick centered and the ball centered with the rudder) and then holding it in the stall to ensure there is no more than the normal tendency to drop a wing, which is easily corrected with small rudder inputs.
Do that before you even consider messing with the angle of incidence on either wing. Then level the aircraft and measure the incidence on each wing to confirm the angle of incidence on the suspect wing really is off, confirm the ailerons are properly rigged, and then - and only then - mess with the strut fork.