kubark42
Well-known member
I read an interesting article about Vne, which explains that Vne can be due to flutter, or other structural limitations: https://www.australianflying.com.au/news/vne-and-flutter-explained
It got me wondering about the 7ECA, which has a 162mph Vne. Is it flutter or is it something structural? If it's flutter, then I have to rethink doing aerobatics at 5,000', and that means that a 140mph dive for a loop is actually closer to 155mph TAS-- just 7mph short of the 162mph limit.
However, @BB57 once said that Vne was the speed where the Citabria's windshield collapsed. That's a pretty cool way to know that no one has ever oversped the airframe, no matter what errors might have accumulated in the pitot-static system. If @BB57 is right, then the Vne limitation is 162mph CAS, as the pressure on the windscreen is a function of CAS, not TAS.
It got me wondering about the 7ECA, which has a 162mph Vne. Is it flutter or is it something structural? If it's flutter, then I have to rethink doing aerobatics at 5,000', and that means that a 140mph dive for a loop is actually closer to 155mph TAS-- just 7mph short of the 162mph limit.
However, @BB57 once said that Vne was the speed where the Citabria's windshield collapsed. That's a pretty cool way to know that no one has ever oversped the airframe, no matter what errors might have accumulated in the pitot-static system. If @BB57 is right, then the Vne limitation is 162mph CAS, as the pressure on the windscreen is a function of CAS, not TAS.
