1975 7KCAB Restoration

My point was that the locals did not read the letter. It plainly said the card was needed, but it did so using only its document number.

My guy was very pleasant, but said that IACRA was easy if I would just do everything right. Right back atcha.

We had a choice this year - IACRA, e-mail, or personal visit. I chose e-mail; they turned it into a personal visit - my date assigned was March 11, 2023, so I kind of e-mailed them on March 11, 2025 and suggested I would be two years late, but present.
 
I flew about 75 miles to meet them in another town. You might say staying proficient to stay current. Kind of interesting to meet up with them in another environment and see how they deal with other I.A.s outside of the area. I always learn something by having face time with these folks as it seems to pay dividends when they can put a face with a name. Too much screen time for all of us these days and with that some inherent dangers. Just like staring at that wonderful new flat screen avionics panel and forgetting to look out the wind screen.

Cheers, Brian
 
Wing came together. Challenging but very rewarding. Seems like all builds are a one off when it comes to inspection panel placement. @AKgcaa can you please post a picture of the layout you ended up using for build a couple months ago? I am at the same fork in the road.

If anyone has a wooden wing, pictures would be of great help.

Also attached at bottom of post as a PDF is Champions original placement before AD.

IMG_0588.webp

IMG_0649.webp

IMG_0822.webp

IMG_0852.webp

IMG_0890.webp

IMG_0881.webp
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I suspect the problem is that no arrangement of inspection rings or Rainbow panels will allow an actual "every square inch of all four sides" inspection. I have heard that eleven rings usually satisfies most IAs.

The only way to actually do the inspection called for in the AD would be to uncover the wing first. Even then, you cannot get behind the rib attachment points to see possible compression fractures, and it is really difficult around the gas tanks.
 
Right back at you - how many inspection ports would it take you to certify that you had examined every square inch of all four sides of both spars?
 
I only do mine. As you might note, I personally do not think any number of rings would allow the letter of the AD to be accomplished.

If I were you, I would have your IA read the AD, and tell you where to put them so he/she could make the log entry every year.

Obviously, nobody is stripping and inspecting these spars completely every year. Just as obviously, thousands of wood spar Champs pass the required inspection. I really cannot comment further, except to say I do not do this inspection on others' airplanes.

Rainbow Ron told me the Decathlon spars have never been an issue. That does not help you.

But what does help: The FAA determined that it was impact (ground, fencepost, maybe hangar door) that caused the compression cracks. You just installed crack-free spars, and as long as you are the only pilot you will know if you have had a subsequent impact.

Again, consult your IA. That is the only way to be sure.
 
Chan, go see Glen at Selma, he can probably tell you. Also look at the inspection panels he made that go around the lift strut fittings. They require a 337 but were really nice
 
Update. Left wing through second coat of Colorado Red. Needs a polish and wax then ready to hang.

Settled on every other bay for inspection panel placement, straddling the spars, while keeping original panel placement near aileron control bell crank and lift strut attach areas.

The higher gloss is credited to spraying on the heavy side, J-3000 mixed 1:4 with colored dope, retarder mixed 1:4 with thinner, and a slow cure. 65 degrees. I touched on this earlier in thread with a few more pointers. This gloss cant keep up with a Ranthane finish, Polyfibers Vinyl finish, or any 2 part finish but holds its own for what it is, dope. And it can be rejuvenated! So that's a plus.

Overall took 16 coats of dope. I ran into blush on my first coat of clear butyrate, got the milky finish, had to sand and go again. Other than that spraying went well.

The stencil I received was short. 7th scallop on original paint scheme tapered right into the wing tip. I decided to throw it on and see how she'd look, didn't mind the straight line in that outboard bay, adjusted the rest of scallops higher on wing then went for it and made it my own.

Next is rejuvenating right wing, adding inspection panels, and matching paint scheme.

Base Nitrate, Panels.webp

Spray Nitrate.webp

Spray Butyrate.webp

Silver on.webp

White on.webp

Glossed White.webp

Stensil.webp

Final Top.webp

Final Bottom.webp
 
Last edited:
Update, advice, and questions.
After finishing my left wing I switched gears to right. Turned into a recover instead of rejuvenation. Happy with spars and the overall build quality from the previous owner that rebuilt in 09.

I ran into a surface defect spraying dope on this wing that is not well written about called "alligator skin".

As a reminder this is a Ceconite job, utilizing Nitrate and Butyrate dope. I first saw this defect starting to develop when spraying transparent tan butyrate. The dope cures to a rough, textured, ugly finish. I say cured intentionally, because while shooting the dope and while observing the initial flash off period the surface is GLOSSED AND SMOOTH. However, during the cure period, the project turns on you and the defect forms. The powerful solvents in dope when sprayed too heavy (excess dope on project) OR in too short of interval (project not fully cured from previous coat) OR having too high of solvent ratio in dope mix (not 50/50 dope to thinner) will lead to the dope to collect/pool, create miniature valleys, and eat at itself. These valleys, if not addressed, will only worsen with subsequent coats. The fix is not more coats to "fill the lows". The creation of the miniature valley's serve as reservoirs for the dope to pool, leading to further and worse pooling if not addressed.

Essentially spraying too much, too fast, or too thinned can lead to a textured finish. Spraying more dope on that textured finish will not fix, fill or "melt it in" but rather worsen by deepening/sharpening the texture.

This is NOT to be confused with Pinholes. Pinholes are formed from an inadequate flash off period. Outer layer dries first, lower layers still off gassing, the gasses escape but at expense of breaking the surface tension of that cured outer layer. Most commonly seen over structure where all gases have to vent out in the same direction, compared to in open bays where those gases can escape both directions.

The simple fix to alligator skin was sanding all of the texture out, 320 wet, then continuing on.

I spoke with Consolidated Aircraft Coatings extensively about my defect throughout the whole process. Our first plan to fix it was sanding + spraying. Basically fill the lows by spraying light coats while knocking down the highs by sanding. Meeting in the middle to reestablish a smooth finish. I tried this for several coats and the wing got better and better, that being said the real results and great finish came only after sanding all of it completely out. If you ever run into this defect you are time ahead to stay sanding until there is no texture at all before spraying your next coat. My attempt to sand + spray and "fix it throughout the silver process" only resulted in sanding all of those silver coats off that wing and starting over with a perfect surface.

The Citabria Parts Manual calls out for cheese cloth over the leading edge before base fabric. I found this rougher wider weaved cloth telegraphed through my dope job on left wing in several places. Hoped through the 16 coats of dope, and especially silver phase, that the telegraphing would get better....never really did. When I recovered the right wing I instead used a simple strip of Ceconite 102, glued around perimeter then bedded it to leading edge with Nitrate. Had 0 problems and the finish/smoothness of this leading edge is much better. I highly recommend this route over cheese cloth.

I have a bone to pick with the creases found in Bias tapes. They have been in every roll I have bought and are hard to get rid of. If you decide to persuade them with an iron you'll shrink the tape, if you decide to keep the crease they will translate through to finish. Sort of a lose lose.
For my ailerons I am going to experiment with Ceconite light straight tapes, pinked edge. I always seem to have a bubble or 2 when laying the medium weight tapes. Hoping the Lights lay down easier being a looser weave, similar to that of Bias, but without the Bias creases (and disgusting seams every 8 feet you must cut out).

Can someone walk me through washing out these wings post install? +1 degree angle of incidence is engineered into the wing root fittings on fuselage. Manual states adjusting rear spar length may be needed to "agree with the angle of incidence at the root", leading to 0 washout. My thought was aviation engineering favored the inboard section of wings stalling first, does 0 washout encourage that to happen? Has anyone adjusted washout after flying and having a heavy wing? When does my fixed rudder trim come in to play?

Thanks in advance everyone.
IMG_1419.webp

IMG_1442.webp

IMG_1446.webp


IMG_1578.webp

IMG_1582.webp

IMG_1587.webp
IMG_1593.webp

IMG_1630.webp

IMG_1650.webp
IMG_1715.webp

IMG_1817.webp
IMG_1874.webp

IMG_1918.webp
IMG_1917.webp
 
Back
Top